Pretreatment With P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the Bern-PCI Registry.

BACKGROUND: Evidence to support immediate P2Y12 inhibitor loading in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is limited. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare outcomes of STEMI patients receiving immediate or delayed P2Y12 inhibitor treatment. METHODS: Using data from the prospective Bern-PCI registry between 2016 and 2020, we stratified STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention according to time periods with different institutional recommendations regarding P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment. In cohort 1 (October 2016-September 2018), immediate P2Y12 inhibitor treatment was recommended. In cohort 2 (October 2018-September 2020), P2Y12 inhibitor treatment was recommended after coronary anatomy was confirmed. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or definite stent thrombosis at 30 days. Sensitivity analysis included only patients in whom these recommendations were followed. RESULTS: Cohort 1 included 1,116 patients; pretreatment was actually given in 708 (63.4%). Cohort 2 included 847 patients; pretreatment was withheld in 798 (94.2%). The mean age was 65 ± 13 years, and 24% were female. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups. The median difference for P2Y12 loading to angiography was 52 minutes between cohort 1 and 2 and 100 minutes between patients receiving vs not receiving pretreatment. Rates of MACCEs were similar between cohort 1 and cohort 2 (10.1% vs 8.1%; adjusted HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.65-1.28; P = 0.59) and between patients receiving vs not receiving pretreatment (7.1% vs 8.4%; adjusted HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.78-1.74; P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study of patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment was not associated with improved MACCEs.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction with immediate combination therapy of statin and ezetimibe compared to statin monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend a stepwise initiation of lipid-lowering therapy after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in treatment-naïve individuals. Patients might benefit from an earlier and stronger low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction through upfront combination therapies. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients without previous lipid-lowering therapy undergoing acute or elective PCI with stent implantation between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients initiated on statin monotherapy vs. a combination of statin and ezetimibe were compared. The primary endpoint was an LDL­C reduction into the target range of < 55 mg/dL at 3 months. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS: A total of 204 lipid-lowering therapy naive patients were included, of whom 157 (77.0%) received statin monotherapy and 47 (23.0%) combination therapy. Median LDL­C levels were higher in patients initiated on combination therapy vs. monotherapy (140 mg/dL, interquartile range, IQR, 123-167 mg/dL vs. 102 mg/dL, IQR 80-136 mg/dL, p < 0.001). The LDL­C reduction was greater in patients treated with combination therapy vs. statin monotherapy (-73 mg/dL, -52.1% vs. -43 mg/dL, -42.2%, p < 0.001). While the primary endpoint was similar between groups (44.7% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.275), combination therapy significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving the treatment target in the presence of an admission LDL-C > 120 mg/dL (46.2% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.031). The rates of MACE were similar between the two groups (10.6% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.237) at a median follow-up of 2.2 years, IQR 1.46-3.10 years. CONCLUSION: Immediate initiation of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe treatment might be considered as the default strategy in treatment-naïve patients with high admission LDL­C undergoing PCI.

Timing of Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel coronary artery disease, the time at which complete revascularization of nonculprit lesions should be performed remains unknown. METHODS: We performed an international, open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial at 37 sites in Europe. Patients in a hemodynamically stable condition who had STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to undergo immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; immediate group) or PCI of the culprit lesion followed by staged multivessel PCI of nonculprit lesions within 19 to 45 days after the index procedure (staged group). The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure at 1 year after randomization. The percentages of patients with a primary or secondary end-point event are provided as Kaplan-Meier estimates at 6 months and at 1 year. RESULTS: We assigned 418 patients to undergo immediate multivessel PCI and 422 to undergo staged multivessel PCI. A primary end-point event occurred in 35 patients (8.5%) in the immediate group as compared with 68 patients (16.3%) in the staged group (risk ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.72; P<0.001 for noninferiority and P<0.001 for superiority). Nonfatal myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization occurred in 8 patients (2.0%) and 17 patients (4.1%), respectively, in the immediate group and in 22 patients (5.3%) and 39 patients (9.3%), respectively, in the staged group. The risk of death from any cause, the risk of stroke, and the risk of hospitalization for heart failure appeared to be similar in the two groups. A total of 104 patients in the immediate group and 145 patients in the staged group had a serious adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients in hemodynamically stable condition with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease, immediate multivessel PCI was noninferior to staged multivessel PCI with respect to the risk of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure at 1 year. (Supported by Boston Scientific; MULTISTARS AMI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03135275.).

Ultrathin-strut vs thin-strut drug-eluting stents for multi and single-stent lesions: A lesion-level subgroup analysis of 2 randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Whether ultrathin-strut stents are particularly beneficial for lesions requiring implantation of more than 1 stent is unknown. METHODS: In a post-hoc lesion-level analysis of 2 randomized trials comparing ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer Sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) vs thin-strut durable polymer Everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES), lesions were stratified into multistent lesions (MSL) vs single-stent lesions (SSL). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of lesion-related unclear/cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or revascularization, at 24 months. RESULTS: Among 5328 lesions in 3397 patients, 1492 (28%) were MSL (722 with BP-SES, 770 with DP-EES). At 2 years, TLF occurred in 63 lesions (8.9%) treated with BP-SES and 60 lesions (7.9%) treated with DP-EES in the MSL-group (subdistibution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.13; 95% CI, 0.77-1.64; P = .53), and in 121 (6.4%) and 136 (7.4%) lesions treated with BP-SES and DP-EES respectively (SHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.62-1.18; P = .35) in the SSL-group (P for interaction = .241). While the rates of lesion-related MI or revascularization were significantly lower in SSL treated with BP-SES as compared to DP-EES (3.5% vs 5.2%; SHR, 0.67; 95% CI 0.46-0.97; P = .036), no significant difference was observed in MSL (7.1% vs 5.4%; SHR, 1.31; 95% CI 0.85-2.03; P = .216) with significant interaction between groups (P for interaction = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of TLF are similar between ultrathin-strut BP-SES and thin-strut DP-EES in MSL and SSL. The use of ultrathin-strut BP-SES vs thin-strut DP-EES did not prove to be particularly beneficial for the treatment of multistent lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Post-hoc analysis from the BIOSCIENCE (NCT01443104) and BIOSTEMI (NCT02579031) trials.

Clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions later than 48 h after symptom onset.

AIMS: Routine revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting >48 h after symptom onset is not recommended. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared outcomes of STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to total ischaemic time. Patients included in the Bern-PCI registry and the Multicenter Special Program University Medicine ACS (SPUM-ACS) between 2009 and 2019 were analysed. Based on symptom-to-balloon-time, patients were categorized as early (<12 h), late (12-48 h), or very late presenters (>48 h). Co-primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Of 6589 STEMI patients undergoing PCI, 73.9% were early, 17.2% late, and 8.9% very late presenters. The mean age was 63.4 years, and 22% were female. At 1 year, all-cause mortality occurred more frequently in late vs. early [5.8 vs. 4.4%, hazard ratio (HR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.78, P = 0.04] and very late (6.8%) vs. early presenters (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.12-2.25, P < 0.01). There was no excess in mortality comparing very late and late presenters (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.79-1.77, P = 0.42). Target lesion failure was more frequent in late vs. early (8.3 vs. 6.5%, HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.02-1.63, P = 0.04) and very late (9.4%) vs. early presenters (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.09-1.97, P = 0.01), and similar between very late and late presenters (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.81-1.60, P = 0.46). Following adjustment, heart failure, impaired renal function, and previous gastrointestinal bleeding, but not treatment delay, were the main drivers of outcomes. CONCLUSION: PCI >12 h after symptom onset was associated with less favourable outcomes, but very late vs. late presenters did not have an excess in events. While benefits seem uncertain, (very) late PCI appeared safe.

Pharmacist interventions to improve blood pressure control in primary care: a cluster randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: High blood pressure (BP) is the single largest contributor to mortality world-wide. AIM: To investigate the effectiveness of a pharmacists-led intervention to improve BP control using automated office blood pressure (AOBP). METHOD: In this prospective parallel group, unblinded, cluster-randomised trial, 54 pharmacies enrolled pre-treated patients with uncontrolled AOBP above 135/85 mmHg. In the interventional group, pharmacists referred patients to the treating physician for therapy intensification in a structured fashion. In the control group, AOBP was recorded until the end of the trial. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving BP control at the threshold of 135/85 mmHg after 10 weeks. Key secondary endpoints were systolic AOBP reductions after 10 and 20 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients were included between 2017 and 2019. In the interventional and control group, 61.5% and 19.8% of patients underwent a therapy modification within 20 weeks. The primary endpoint was achieved in 38.8% in the interventional group and 31.2% in the control group (mean difference 7.6%, 95% CI -8.1; 23.3, p = 0.336). Mean systolic AOBP reductions were greater in the interventional vs. control group at 10 and 20 weeks (14.3 ± 7.4 vs. 6.9 ± 7.0 mmHg, mean difference 7.3 mmHg, 95% CI 3.2;11.5, p < 0.001, and 15.5 ± 9.0 vs. 9.8 ± 7.5 mmHg, mean difference 5.8 mmHg, 95% CI 0.8;10.7, p = 0.023). Atrial fibrillation was newly detected in 7.8% of patients. CONCLUSION: Through a pragmatic pharmacist-led disease management program, BP control was improved over time, without significant differences between groups. Greater systolic AOBP reductions were observed in the interventional vs. control group. (Pharmacists Intervention to Improve Hypertension Management in Primary Care:APOTHECARE; ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT03274531).

Neurotensin and Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background: Neurotensin is involved in fatty acid and glucose metabolism and promotes the development of obesity and diabetes. These associations appear to be more pronounced in women. We investigated the association of neurotensin with long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: We included 452 consecutive patients [144 (31.9%) females] undergoing PCI for ACS or CCS. Plasma samples drawn after PCI were analyzed for neurotensin with an enzyme-linked immunoassay. As primary endpoint, a composite of MACE including all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke during 7 years of follow-up was investigated. As secondary endpoint, we investigated all-cause death. Results: Neurotensin levels did not differ between male and female patients (p = 0.560). MACE occurred in 150 (33.2%) patients. Restricted cubic splines demonstrated a U-shaped association of log-transformed neurotensin with the primary and secondary endpoint. Therefore, we dichotomized our cohort according to tertiles of log-transformed neurotensin. In Kaplan-Meier analysis including the total cohort and restricted to male patients log- neurotensin tertiles were not associated with MACE (both p > 0.05). Moreover, in the overall cohort and in male patients multivariable Cox regression analysis log-neurotensin tertiles were not associated with MACE or with all-cause death (all p > 0.05). However, in female patients log-neurotensin was associated with MACE in Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank p = 0.013). Also, after multivariable adjustment female patients in the first tertile had a significantly increased risk for MACE compared to female patients in the second tertile [HR 3.84 (95% CI 1.71-8.60), p = 0.001]. There was tendency for increased risk in female patients in the third tertile compared to the second tertile [HR 2.14 (95% CI 0.97-4.73), p = 0.058]. Moreover, in female patients the [first and the third tertile of log- neurotensin were associated with all-cause death 1s vs. 2nd tertile: HR 3.03 (95% CI 1.21-7.63), p = 0.018; 3rd vs. 2nd tertile: HR 3.01 (95% CI 1.22-7.44), p = 0.016]. Conclusion: In female patients with CAD undergoing PCI, neurotensin has a U-shaped relationship with adverse outcomes. These data suggest a sex specific association between neurotensin and long-term adverse events after PCI.

Reclassification, Thromboembolic, and Major Bleeding Outcomes Using Different Estimates of Renal Function in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From the PREFER-in-AF and PREFER-in-AF Prolongation Registries.

BACKGROUND: The Cockcroft-Gault formula is recommended to determine a renal indication for dose reduction of dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. Nephrology guidelines now recommend the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formulae as more accurate estimates of glomerular filtration rate. METHODS: We analyzed anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation who were enrolled in the Prevention of Thromboembolic Events - European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation (PREFER in AF). The proportion of patients with dissimilar renal dosing indications was assessed when applying Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, or CKD-EPI. Thromboembolic and major bleeding events at 1 year were compared in patients in whom Cockcroft-Gault and CKD-EPI provided concordant or discordant results around a threshold of 50 mL/minute. RESULTS: Out of 1288 patients with atrial fibrillation with chronic kidney disease in whom Cockcroft-Gault suggested a dose reduction of dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban (creatinine clearance ≤50 mL/minutes), 19% and 16% were reclassified to the respective higher doses, and 24% and 23% to the respective lower doses by applying the MDRD and CKD-EPI formulae, respectively. In patients potentially receiving a different dose of dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban when using CKD-EPI, we observed an excess of thromboembolic events (4.1% versus 0.8%; odds ratio, 5.5 [95% CI, 1.5-20.8]; P=0.01). Major bleeding rates were nonsignificantly different in the discordance versus concordance group (5.7% versus 2.7%; odds ratio, 2.2 [95% CI, 0.9-5.6]; P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The MDRD and CKD-EPI formulae suggest a different dosing in up to a quarter of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. This seems to impact hard outcomes.

Antithrombotic management and outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation treated with NOACs early at the time of market introduction: Main results from the PREFER in AF Prolongation Registry.

The management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has rapidly changed with increasing use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and changes in the use of rhythm control therapy. The prevention of thromboembolic events European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation Prolongation Registry (PREFER Prolongation) enrolled consecutive patients with AF on NOACs between 2014 and 2016 in a multicentre, prospective, observational study with one-year follow-up, focusing on the time of introduction of NOACs. Overall, 3783 patients were enrolled, with follow-up information available in 3223 (85%). Mean age was 72.2 ± 9.4 years, 40% were women, mean CHA2DS2VASc score was 3.4 ± 1.6, and 2587 (88.6%) had a CHA2DS2VASc score ≥ 2. Rivaroxaban was used in half of patients, and dabigatran and apixaban were used in about a quarter of patients each; edoxaban was not available for use in Europe at the time. Major cardiovascular event rate was low: serious events occurred in 74 patients (84 events, 2%), including 24 strokes (1%), 62 major bleeds (2%), of which 30 were life-threatening (1%) and 3 intracranial (0.1%), and 28 acute coronary syndromes (1%). Mortality was 2%. Antiarrhythmic drugs were used in about 50% of patients, catheter ablation in 5%. Adverse events were low in this contemporary European cohort of unselected AF patients treated with NOACs already at the time of their first introduction, despite high thromboembolic risk.

Rationale and design of the MULTISTARS AMI Trial: A randomized comparison of immediate versus staged complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

About half of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) present with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD). Recent evidence supports complete revascularization in these patients. However, optimal timing of non-culprit lesion revascularization in STEMI patients is unknown because dedicated randomized trials on this topic are lacking. STUDY DESIGN: The MULTISTARS AMI trial is a prospective, international, multicenter, randomized, two-arm, open-label study planning to enroll at least 840 patients. It is designed to investigate whether immediate complete revascularization is non-inferior to staged (within 19-45 days) complete revascularization in patients in stable hemodynamic conditions presenting with STEMI and MVD and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). After successful primary PCI of the culprit artery, patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to immediate or staged complete revascularization. The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The MULTISTARS AMI trial tests the hypothesis that immediate complete revascularization is non-inferior to staged complete revascularization in stable patients with STEMI and MVD.

Von Willebrand Factor and ADAMTS13 and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Von Willebrand factor (VWF) and its cleaving protease a disintegrin-like and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type I repeats 13 (ADAMTS13) are pivotal mediators of thrombosis and are associated with the progression of atherosclerosis. We investigated the impact of VWF, ADAMTS13 and VWF/ADAMTS13 on long-term major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (MACE) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We analysed 701 patients undergoing PCI between 2003 and 2006. VWF and ADAMTS13 antigen levels were measured before PCI. As primary endpoint, we investigated MACE, a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke during 8 years of follow-up. As secondary endpoint, we investigated all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Mean age was 63.8 years, 496 (70.8%) were male. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was diagnosed in 347 (49.5%) patients, stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) in 354 (50.5%). During follow-up 228 (32.5%) patients experienced MACE, and 161 (23.0%) died. In ACS patients, VWF was significantly associated with MACE (HR 1.402 (95%CI 1.003-1.959), p = 0.048), whereas ADAMTS13 and VWF/ADAMTS13 had no predictive value. In SCAD, neither VWF, ADAMTS13, nor VWF/ADAMTS13 correlated with MACE. VWF was significantly associated with all-cause death in ACS patients (HR 1.841 (95%CI 1.187-2.856), p = 0.006), but not in SCAD (1.394 (95%CI 0.856-2.269), p = 0.181). ADAMTS13 and VWF/ADAMTS13 were not correlated with ACS and SCAD, respectively. CONCLUSION: VWF but not ADAMTS13 and VWF/ADAMTS13 was associated with MACE and mortality in patients with ACS but not SCAD. This finding highlights the importance of VWF as an essential marker of risk in patients with ACS.

Thromboembolic and bleeding risk in obese patients with atrial fibrillation according to different anticoagulation strategies.

BACKGROUND: Data on the relationship between body mass index (BMI), thromboembolic events (TEE) and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are controversial, and further evidence on the risk of such events in obese patients with AF receiving different anticoagulant therapies (OAC) is needed. METHODS AND RESULTS: We divided a total of 9330 participants from the prospective PREFER in AF and PREFER in AF PROLONGATION registries into BMI quartiles at baseline. Outcome measures were TEE and major bleeding complications at the 1-year follow-up. Without OAC, there was a ≥6-fold increase of TEE in the 4th vs other BMI quartiles (P = .019). OAC equalized the rates of TEE across different BMI strata. The occurrence of major bleeding was highest in patients with BMI in the 1st as well as in the 4th BMI quartile [OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.03-2.78, P = .039 and OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.13-3.04, P = .014 vs those in the 3rd quartile, respectively]. At propensity score-adjusted analysis, the incidence of TEE and major bleeding in obese patients receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or vitamin K-antagonist anticoagulants (VKAs) was similar (P ≥ .34). CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world data suggest no obesity paradox for TEE in patients with AF. Obese patients are at higher risk of TEE, and here OAC dramatically reduces the risk of events. We here found a comparable clinical outcome with NOACs and VKAs in obese patients. Low body weight and obesity were also associated with bleeding, and therefore OAC with the best safety profile should be considered in this setting.

[Austrian Consensus on High Blood Pressure 2019]. / Österreichischer Blutdruckkonsens 2019.

Elevated blood pressure remains a major cause of cardiovascular disease, disability, and premature death in Austria, with suboptimal rates of detection, treatment and control also in recent years. Management of hypertension is a common challenge for physicians with different spezializations. In an attempt to standardize diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and, ultimately, to increase the rate of patients with controlled blood pressure and to decrease the burden of cardiovascular disease, 13 Austrian medical societies reviewed the evidence regarding prevention, detection, workup, treatment and consequences of high blood pressure in general and in various clinical scenarios. The result is presented as the first national consensus on blood pressure. The authors and societies involved are convinced that a joint national effort is needed to decrease hypertension-related morbidity and mortality in our country.

Impact of platelet turnover on long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Increased platelet turnover and high platelet reactivity are associated with short-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). We investigated the impact of platelet turnover on long-term MACE. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with ACS or SCAD undergoing PCI between 2009 and 2010 were included. All patients received clopidogrel and aspirin as dual antithrombotic therapy regimen. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were applied to assess the prognostic impact of platelet turnover (reticulated platelet count [RPC], mean platelet volume [MPV]) and function on long-term MACE, a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke. RESULTS: In total, 477 patients were eligible. Mean age was 64.3 ± 12.7 years, 68.8% were male. Median follow-up was 5.8 (IQR 4.2-6.5) years. Median RPC was 7.6 (IQR 5.6-10.4) g/L and median MPV was 10.7 (IQR 10.1-11.3) fL. In univariable analysis, RPC was associated with MACE, both as continuous (HR 1.064 [95%CI 1.021-1.111]; P = .006) and dichotomized (HR 1.693 [95%CI 1.156-2.481]; P = .006) variable. After adjustment, continuous RPC (HR 1.055 [95%CI 1.012-1.099]; P = .010) and dichotomized RPC (HR 1.716 [95%CI 1.152-2.559]; P = .007) remained significantly associated with MACE. Neither MPV nor platelet function testing was associated with long-term adverse outcome. CONCLUSION: Increased platelet turnover is associated with long-term adverse outcome in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI. Platelet turnover represents a new marker of atherothrombotic risk and might help to guide composition or duration of antiplatelet therapy.

Blood pressure changes after renal denervation are more pronounced in women and nondiabetic patients: findings from the Austrian Transcatheter Renal Denervation Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Three recently published sham-controlled studies proved the efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) in hypertensive patients. The study presented here analyzed a nationwide multicentre registry database to clarify which patient subgroups benefit most from radiofrequency RDN. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis from the multicentre Austrian Transcatheter Renal Denervation Registry hosted by the Austrian Society of Hypertension. We correlated change of SBP after RDN to sex and presence/absence of comorbidities. Univariable correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-one patients (43% women, median age 64 years) undergoing RDN between April 2011 and September 2014 were included in this analysis. Mean baseline ambulatory 24 h BP (systolic/diastolic) was 150 ±â€Š18/89 ±â€Š14 mmHg and mean baseline office BP was 170 ±â€Š16/94 ±â€Š14 mmHg.After RDN, mean ambulatory 24 h BP reduction was 9 ±â€Š19/6 ±â€Š16 mmHg. The following features were associated with a good response to RDN: high baseline systolic ambulatory BP, high baseline diastolic office BP, female sex, absence of diabetes mellitus, and absence of peripheral artery disease. Multivariable analysis identified female sex and absence of diabetes mellitus as strongest predictors for ambulatory BP reduction, although those groups had the lowest baseline ambulatory BP. DISCUSSION: Ambulatory BP reductions after RDN were substantially more pronounced in female and in nondiabetic patients despite lower baseline BP. It is concluded that in terms of efficacy female patients and nondiabetic patients might benefit more from RDN.

Risk factors for thromboembolic and bleeding events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: the prospective, multicentre observational PREvention oF thromboembolic events - European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation (PREFER in AF).

OBJECTIVES: We identified factors associated with thromboembolic and bleeding events in two contemporary cohorts of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), treated with either vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). DESIGN: Prospective, multicentre observational study. SETTING: 461 centres in seven European countries. PARTICIPANTS: 5310 patients receiving a VKA (PREvention oF thromboembolic events - European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation (PREFER in AF), derivation cohort) and 3156 patients receiving a NOAC (PREFER in AF Prolongation, validation cohort) for stroke prevention in AF. OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk factors for thromboembolic events (ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism) and major bleeding (gastrointestinal bleeding, intracerebral haemorrhage and other life-threatening bleeding). RESULTS: The mean age of patients enrolled in the PREFER in AF registry was 72±10 years, 40% were female and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc Score was 3.5±1.7. The incidence of thromboembolic and major bleeding events was 2.34% (95% CI 1.93% to 2.74%) and 2.84% (95% CI 2.41% to 3.33%) after 1-year of follow-up, respectively.Abnormal liver function, prior stroke or transient ischaemic attack, labile international normalised ratio (INR), concomitant therapy with antiplatelet or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, heart failure and older age (≥75 years) were independently associated with both thromboembolic and major bleeding events.With the exception of unstable INR values, these risk factors were validated in patients treated with NOACs (PREFER in AF Prolongation Study, 72±9 years, 40% female, CHA2DS2-VASc 3.3±1.6). For each single point decrease on a modifiable bleeding risk scale we observed a 30% lower risk for major bleeding events (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.76, p<0.01) and a 28% lower rate of thromboembolic events (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.82, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Attending to modifiable risk factors is an important treatment target in anticoagulated AF patients to reduce thromboembolic and bleeding events. Initiation of anticoagulation in those at risk of stroke should not be prevented by elevated bleeding risk scores.

Calculated Serum Osmolality, Acute Kidney Injury, and Relationship to Mortality after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Data on the associations between serum osmolality (sOsmo) and acute kidney injury (AKI) as well as short- and long-term mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between sOsmo and development of AKI and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: We investigated 1,927 consecutive patients undergoing PCI from the registry of a single center. Patients were divided into quartiles according to sOsmo at admission (Q1-Q4). sOsmo was calculated using the following equation: (1.86 × serum sodium [mmol/L]) + (glucose [mg/dL] / 18) + (blood urea nitrogen [mg/dL] / 2.8) + 9. The primary endpoint was AKI, per Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) definition. The secondary endpoints were 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Patients with the highest sOsmo (Q4) were older and more likely female, with significantly more cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities compared to those with lower sOsmo (Q1-Q3). Incidence of AKI was highest in Q4 and lowest in Q2. In the multivariate logistic regression model, high sOsmo independently predicted the development of AKI (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.26-3.19, p = 0.003). Patients with Q4 had a higher risk of 1-year mortality compared to patients with Q2 (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.10-4.15; p = 0.031), but not after adding AKI to the multivariate model (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.87-3.39; p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: sOsmo is a valid and easily obtainable predictor of AKI after PCI. High sOsmo is associated with increased risk of AKI and 1-year mortality in patients undergoing PCI. Further research is warranted to clarify whether the use of an sOsmo-directed hydration protocol might reduce the incidence of AKI in patients undergoing PCI.